About Me

Name: Dennis Pemberton
Location: Largo, FL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Inane Inaugural Supporting Acts- and my poem

Forget the One's speech.  The entertainment was in the supporting acts.  Joseph Lowery, who may be forgiven because of his accomplishments and age, had the most unintentionally funny and gratuitously offensive benediction you are likely to hear.  Stuck in the fifities, Lowery said 
"we ask you to help us work for that day when black will not be asked to get in back (I thought Rosa Parks took care of that, say, FIFTY YEARS AGO), when brown can stick around ... when yellow will be mellow (reminiscent of the environmentalist saying, meant to curb toilet use - 'If it's yellow, let it mellow, if it's brown, flush it down.'  Not sure if the old fellow was talking about excretory functions or habitating Hispanics and calm Chinese)  ... when the red man can get ahead, man (guess St. John's can change their name back to the Red Men, man); and when white will embrace what is right (because that can never happen- after all, a majority voted for BHO)."

Then there was the execrable "poet" Elizabeth Alexander, whose "poem" must be the first post-poetry poem- lacking rhyme, meter, style and substance.  She read it well, though, which was, of course, in keeping with the Man of the Hour.

Since I will never criticize someone for doing something I would not do myself, here is my inaugural poem...

The Inauguration
How we got here is a story already old
Our future, the story not yet told
One man leaves, hated for alleged arrogance and pride
Another enters, his sins under the bus, he's given a free ride
A speech like most others
Inappropriate analogies, mixed metaphors
History told by a modernist
The market by a non-economist
When oft repeated platitudes expire
The cool One runs out of fire
Humbly points his chin to heaven
Saved by a closing blast of cannon

Dennis Pemberton







Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary Deconstructed

SEN. CLINTON: Mr. President-Elect, thank you for this honor and giving me a knife to stick between your ribs. If confirmed, I will give this assignment, your administration, the 2012 race, and our country my all.

I also want to thank my fellow New Yorkers, who have for eight years given me the joy of a job I love, with the opportunity to work on issues I care about deeply, in a state that I cherish, about 400 miles from Bill. And you've also helped prepare me well for this new role. After all, New Yorkers aren't afraid to speak their minds, and do so in every language.  And knishes are delicious, falafel rarely awful, amala is ta die fa, and queso even more so.  And that's my foreign policy experience- being yelled at by cabbies and eating gut wrenching food. 

Leaving the Senate is very difficult for me, because I was supposed to leave as Madame President, but during the last few weeks, as I devoured comfort foods like mac and cheese and Ben and Jerry's, I thought often of our troops, serving bravely under difficult circumstances in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere. I thought of those other Americans in our Foreign and Civil Services, working hard to promote and protect our interests around the world. And I thought of the daunting tasks ahead for our country: an economy that is reeling, a climate that is warming, and, as we saw with the horrible events in Mumbai, threats that are relentless.  And I thought, "President Obama sounds pretty good- sucker!."

The fate of our nation and the future of our children will be forged in the crucible of these global challenges, created primarily by Democratic inattention to serious threats, and Democratic hysteria concerning fake ones. America cannot solve these crises without kissing the rear end of the world, and the world cannot solve them without insulting, discounting, and sneering at America as they hold their hands out. By electing Barack Obama our next president, the American people have demanded not just a new direction at home but a new effort to renew America's standing in the world as a force for positive change.  As opposed to the America that has deposed two dictators, held terror at bay, and provided most of the AIDS funding in Africa.

We know our security, our values, and our interests cannot be protected and advanced by force alone, nor, indeed, by Americans alone. We must pursue vigorous diplomacy using all the tools we can muster to build a future with more partners and fewer adversaries, more opportunities and fewer dangers, for all who seek freedom, peace and prosperity.  If you're an adversary or a danger... give us a break!  His middle name's Hussein!

America is a place founded on the idea that everyone should have the right to live up to his or her God-given potential, and it is that same ideal that must guide America's purpose in the world today. Granted, that was an incredibly tortured way to say nothing, but what do you want?  I'm stuck with his speechwriters now.  And while we are determined to defend our freedoms and liberties at all costs, we also reach out to the world again, seeking common cause and higher ground.  And what is freedom and what is liberty, if the rest of the world doesn't like us?  So maybe not "at all costs."

And so I believe the best way to continue serving my country is to join President-elect Obama, Vice President-elect Biden, the leaders here and the dedicated public servants of the State Department on behalf of our nation at this defining moment.  By the way, what exactly is a "defining moment?"  Because when Barry got elected, that was a defining moment.  Now we've got another defining moment?  Guess that's what happens when you elect a cipher- he keeps on getting defined.  And re-defined.

President Kennedy once said that engaging the world to meet the threats we face was the greatest adventure of our century.  

Well, Mr. President-elect, I am proud to join you on what will be a difficult and exciting adventure in this new century. And may God bless you and all who serve with you and our great country.  And God deliver me from the "inspirational" pap your speechwriters make me say.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The root cause...

An autopsy of the McCain defeat will show many causes, no one of which resulted in failure, but which accumulated to doom the candidacy.  McCain was probably always the best candidate to win, and Palin, despite both justified and unjustified criticism, was undoubtedly the best VP choice.  But the McCain candidacy was tactical, not strategic, to harken back to an episode of semantic hairsplitting from the second debate.  It could have won this election, but almost certainly not the next.  McCain said he was conservative, but during the primaries he was as anti-corporate as any Democrat.  He was always a strong foreign policy guy, but on economics he was a mixed bag, unable to articulate a clear message until Joe the Sanitary Engineer made the case against Obama plain.  A McCain Administration would lead to a rudderless conservative movement, alternately supported and undermined by its titular head.

So forget about winning elections for a minute.  What can we do to win hearts and minds?  To a certain extent, this battle will be reactionary, dependent on what the Obama administration and the Congress do.  But we can, and must, elucidate a unifying principle, one that is a launching pad for other ideas which signify not just opposition, but forward-looking vision.  There are clues in the wreckage.  The marriage amendments passed.  An affirmative action amendment passed.  Pro-stem cell amendments passed.  Doctor assisted euthanasia passed.  Anti-abortion amendments failed.  What's the message?

Environmentalism has been the most successful leftist idea of the last half-century.  Even Osama Bin Laden decried global warming (suicide bombers are their own carbon offset, so he's pretty green).  I believe this has resulted in a new mercantilism- a concept that there is only so much wealth in the world, only so many resources, and eventually we'll just be trading them back and forth like a massive game of Go Fish.  Babies who aren't wanted would just use precious resources, and if they can be mined for the health of the rest of us, then even better.  Tradition is fine, as long as it doesn't cost anything- telling gays not to mess with marriage has no economic impact, so that's okay.  Affirmative action can prevent those who are best qualified from succeeding, so that's another waste of resources;  end it.  But babies who live become wards of the State, which uses up resources to which those who are already here are entitled.  This is a pervasive mindset, and it cannot be changed with references to religion- religion will ban gay marriage, but it cannot trump survival instinct, at least politically.  To change this reductionism requires communicationg an optimism which is opposed  by the prevailing orthodoxies of global warming, habitat depletion, and overpopulation.  It requires a re-education, presented with the calm certitude of a concerned teacher, rather than the fiery bromides of a revolutionary.  Obama won in part by appearing calm, in control, and smart.

I think that may be a good place to start.  Argue that things are not bad, with concrete examples, and show how environmentalism actually makes things worse.  And do it concisely, because people are too busy to listen if it takes more than a minute to grab them.  Why didn't William Ayers attacks work?  Because Obama was 8 years old when he did his killing, and it takes half an hour to show why Ayers is a present danger, and not some culture warrior from long ago.

I may be off base, but I think this is a good place to start.  Identify the green root. And attack it.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'm peeling off my McCain sticker...

We are not going to be like those pitiful fools who drive around with "Dukakis/Bentsen" decals on their cars.  We will show in defeat how we are different than the Left.  I will not be counting down the days until the next election, I will not be buying Joe Biden "Gaffe a day" calendars, I will not chant "End of an Error" endlessly.  We have a new President.  As of now, he is a blank canvas;  we have no idea if listening to Reverend Wright for 20 years was out of political expedience or personal sympathy.  Maybe he is a man who takes on the shape of those around him- like the radical neighborhood which he literally shared with Bill Ayers and Louis Farakhan.  Well, he's moving now, and the neighborhood is very small.  1600 Pennsylvania Avenue can be a very lonely place.  Our Country comes first, and it is on her behalf that we will pray for him.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Joe the Wife Beater? Plus contest!

Now the Kos-style blogs are all alleging that Joe the Plumber is in fact, Joe the Wife Beater.  Whether he is or isn't, aren't these nicknames more newsworthy:

Barack the coke snorter
Joe the truth and face-stretcher
Sarah one of us
John the Hero

CONTEST!
Pick a nickname for one of the candidates, and the best one will win a day's supply of Kleenex for use on November 4.  Tears of joy, or tears of deep, un-remitted despair.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Saw Prager and Medved

Kind of a small crowd, probably because of the time- I don't know if any of the other events on this tour were this early in the morning.  Both were good, but Dennis spent ten minutes answering the first question, which cut down on the number of questions being asked.  The whole tone (among the audience) was of guarded optimism, but by no means as enthusiastic as we have heard about other venues on this tour.  Not sure why, but Medved, who would probably be the one setting mood more so than the usually low-key Prager, had been on Larry King at 10:00 the night before, and I'm sure didn't get to bed until late Thursday night.  He looked exhausted.  

I was pleased to see a few blacks among the audience.  If Republicans are the party of values, there should be more.

Anyway, thanks to 860 for sponsoring.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Foreign Policy? Huh?

I was tapped by my Father-in-law to participate in a Rotaract panel on the election on Monday.  I asked for the issues we would be speaking on, and this was the response:

"Each of the 4 panelists will spend approximately 2 minutes stating views on the issues of energy, education, health care, and the economy. And then, we will hold a Q and A session."

I e-mailed back "What about foreign policy?"  No response.  Can't tell which way this thing is going to be slanted...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Election of 1948 and the infomercial that backfired

Dewey v. Truman In the final weeks of the campaign, American movie theatres agreed to play two short newsreel-like campaign films in support of the two major-party candidates; each film had been created by its respective campaign organization. The Dewey film, shot professionally on an impressive budget, featured very high production values, but somehow reinforced an image of the New York governor as cautious and distant. The Truman film, hastily assembled on virtually no budget by the perpetually cash-short Truman campaign, relied heavily on public-domain and newsreel footage of the President taking part in major world events and signing important legislation. Perhaps unintentionally, the Truman film visually reinforced an image of the President as engaged and decisive. Years later, historian David McCullough cited the expensive, but lackluster, Dewey film, and the far cheaper, but more effective, Truman film, as important factors in determining the preferences of undecided voters. (from wikipedia) ?

Of course, the MSM would never let McCain have 30 minutes of network time, but this would make a replay of the 1948 scenario even sweeter.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Rollercoaster

With each poll, we can hear the chink-chink-chink as the rollercoaster car is slowly pulled up the hill.  Obama up by 13 in LA Times.  Chink!  Obama up by 5 in Rasmussen.  Chink!  Race tied in Indiana.  Chink!  You get that sick feeling in your stomach, even as the rollercoaster pauses at the top, teetering over the abyss.  I want to beleive the United States is not so far gone as to elect a inexperienced demagogue disguised as a "uniter."  But something is telling me we are due for a cathartic period of correction, a social cataclysm caused by the rejection/ignorance of our core values.  The propaganda wars have been fought covertly in the public schools and the universities, and feel-good foolishness pervades our culture.  I was having a discussion with some Obama supporters in my office, and mentioned the Infant Born Alive Protection Act.  Fine with them!  With finite resources, we can't care about kids whose parents don't want them!  We are on the brink of true progressivist fascism- eugenics, confiscation of wealth, radicalization of the culture.  Even should he win, McCain seems unlikely to brake the car as it rushes down the tracks.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Huey P. Obama

In preparation for a Presidential run against FDR, whom he deemed insufficiently socialist, Senator Huey Long created "Share Our Wealth."  Its motto was "Every Man a King," proposing wealth redistribution measures in the form of a net asset tax on large corporations and individuals of great wealth.  For example, income tax rates would be at 100% for all incomes over $1 million, and personal assets exceeding 9 million dollars would have been confiscated.

Here is the song Long wrote for his program.  Obama should play it at his inauguration, if he is so blessed and we are so cursed:

Why weep or slumber America
Land of brave and true
With castles and clothing and food for all
All belongs to you

Ev'ry man a king, ev'ry man a king
For you can be a millionaire
But there's something belonging to others
There's enough for all people to share
When its sunny June and December too
Or in the Winter time or Spring
There'll be peace without end
Ev'ry neighbor a friend
With ev'ry man a king

Of course, Long never got the chance to unseat Roosevelt, as he was shot to death in 1935- either on purpose by Dr. Carl Weiss, or by mistake by his own bodyguards.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Project UnBias

Reuters- A plan to reverse public perception of media bias in the 2008 campaign was revealed in a New York Times e-mail leaked today.  In the e-mail, Times Editorial Chief Andrew Rosenthal asked Times opinion writers to moderate their coverage of John McCain and Sarah Palin.  "There is evidence," the e-mail began, "that perceived media bias is eroding Barack Obama's standing in the polls."  The e-mail, whose subject line was "Project UnBias," continued  "We need to reverse that trend.  Emphasize the positive in covering McCain/Palin, as hard as that may be to find.  I know Palin's a barely literate hick, but talk about something else, like... Well, I don't know, you're the writers!"  Prior to the release of this e-mail, many had been dumbfounded by pieces like Thomas Friedman's "The Sarah You Don't Know," which extolled her baking skills, but in the lastparagraph states: "But nobody makes brownies like Barack."  Maureen Dowd's column "Not as stupid as Bush" and Frank Rich's "McCain's not Hitler" were evidently also written in respons to Rosenthal's e-mail. The Times has not responded to requests for information or comment on this story.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Once again, nobody asked me...

But here's what John McCain could say tonight that would TURN THE ELECTION AROUND.  Maybe.
My friends, I know you're hurting right now.  And I know you want somebody to fix the problem.  And you want to know who did this to you.  My friends, it is with great humility that I say to you... We did this to you.  Senator Obama and Senator Biden, and I, we did this to you.  In our arrogance from decades of government service, we thought we could legislate away reality.  We thought we could legislate away personal responsibility.  We thought we could legislate away the consequences of bad actions.  If only there was a law, we said, which made banks give mortgages to people who couldn't afford them, wouldn't things be great?  Until the mortgages come due.  If we don't drill for oil, we said, our country would be pristine and beautiful, and what harm could come?  None, until foreign dictators use our reluctance as a gun pointed at our heads.  If we pull our troops out of an unpopular war, everyone will love us, right?  Until they despise us for being weak.  If we tax rich people, and corporations everything will be peachy, right?  Until they decide they don't want to be so rich if the fruit of their labor is going to be confiscated, or until they decide they would rather relocate to Ireland, or one of the 25 other industrial economies that have lower corporate taxes.  We did this to you, and don't let us deny it.

But America is too great a country to be brought down by Congress.  America is a land carved out of a wilderness with hard work, determination, and a belief that tomorrow will be better than today.  Not because Congress makes it a law.  But because we are a great people who do great things.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Killer Questions for Barry

Let's have a little contest- who can come up with the best, single question to pose to BHO, whose answer has the power to strip his facade bare.  I don't know that I have a good one, but here goes:

Senator Obama, name one time you took a job for which you were personally responsible, and saw it through to a successful conclusion, ending in a real accomplishment.  Tell us what you did personally, and what of substance was accomplished.  This campaign doesn't count.

The winner of the contest gets to be investigated by a BHO FBI, IRS, or get the cold shoulder of a post-partisan John McCain.  Who can resist?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tonight, tonight...

It doesn't look good for Team McCain;  even though this has been an election of back and forth lead changes, the trends are now solidly in Obama's favor.  There is enough offal fermenting in the goo- ACORN, Ayers, Wright, Khalidi, Kenya, etc.- that some of it might eventually stick to Obama.  But John McCain has to stick his hands in that goo and start flinging it.  He can't make a halting attempt to attack Obama, then put his hand to his forehead and mutter that Barry's a nice guy.  You just end up with the cr*p on your faace instead of his.  We'll see tonight what happens, but McCain needs to be who he hasn't been:  a fighter armed not with bromides about honor, but with bullets.  Ayers hates America, and you knew it! BAM!  ACORN stealing this election, and you gave them money!  BAM!  You want to take money from the people who actually earn it and give it to people who don't! BAM!  You're a good guy!  Click.  You want to destroy the healthcare system!  BAM!  I'm going to reform it with (insert intense policy knowledge here)!  BAM!  I respect your accomplishment!  Click.  Does that light mean I'm out of time?  Click. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barry H. Marx

AP-  A candid conversation with a plumber turned into a free for all at an Obama rally.  The plumber, Mr. Ewen McCoy asked Mr. Obama about raising taxes, to which Obama replied that he didn't want to punish McCoy's success, but wanted to "spread the wealth" so that others could have the same chance at success.  Obama then proceeded to put his plan into action.  The next person to ask him a question was a young woman, Lydia Morgan, who said she had trouble paying for college.  "We'll see if we can get you some relief," Obama said, then he called out to the plumber.  "Hey man, can I see your wallet?"  he asked Mr. McCoy.  McCoy looked quizzical, but nevertheless handed Obama his wallet.  "Let's see, 5, 20, 45... looks like about a hundred dollars here,"  said Obamaa as he counted the bills in the wallet.  "How would $60.00 hold you, ma'am," Obama said, handing Morgan three 20 dollar bills from McCoy's wallet.  "Oh, thank you, Senator," said Morgan, tucking the money happily in her pants.  Obama flipped the wallet back to McCoy.  "But I've got to pay for parking,"  McCoy said, "and they only take cash."  Obama pursed his lips reflectively, then spoke to the man next to McCoy: "Sir, you're wearing a suit.  What do you do for a living?"  Wary, the man, Jack Clem, said he owned a clothing business.  "Let me see your wallet, please."  When Clem balked, the crowd started chanting "Fairness, fairness, fairness,"  and Clem reluctantly handed over his wallet.  "Wow, $200.00.  You don't trust banks, do you?"  Obama said after looking in Clem's wallet.  Clem began to explain that he needed the money to take advantage of a cash discount for gasoline, but Obama had already taken 20 dollars out of his wallet and handed it to McCoy.  "Thanks Senator, said McCoy, but I'd really rather have my 40 bucks back."  "We all have to do our part."  said Obama.

For almost an hour, Obama took money from one person only to give a portion of it to another.  Obama basked in the thanks of the recipients.  The "donors" were not so happy.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive